Celebrating personal discordia and spiritual anarchy.




Search This Blog


"Anarchy is not intended to be sustainable. It is not a system of government, a codified list of rules and beliefs, or a mind set geared toward cultural constructivism. It is a spark, a flash, a small flame that ignites a paradigm-obliterating explosion. It is destructive by nature. It lies dormant and, like diesel fuel, can only be ignited by tremendous pressure. It deconstructs. It strips flesh from bone and grinds bone to dust. It is doomed to consumption in the conflagration instigated by its own primal spark. It is a catalyst. It is tinder. It is powder and fuse."

Rich Oliver




Ganging Up on the Fed

Should we, like the Sons of Liberty, encourage gangs and thugs to incite violence against the rising tide of oppression fueled by rabid Federal power grabs? Maybe. I'm just sayin..

It wouldn't be a new idea, or a particularly unAmerican concept...it has been done before.

The two original Sons of Liberty organizations (New York City and Boston) quickly established correspondence and communications with ever emerging Sons of Liberty groups in New England, the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia. Typically, members of this organization were men from the middle and upper classes of American colonial society. Although the movement began as a secret society, for reasons of safety and anonymity, the organization quickly sought to build a broad, public base of political support among the colonists. Frequently, cooperation with undisciplined and extralegal groups (city gangs) set off violent actions. Even though the Sons seldom looked for violent solutions and eruptions, they did continue to elicit and promote political upheaval that tended to favor crowd action.

"Crowd action". Hmmmmm. Patriot or Terrorist, guess that depends on your point of view.

Carbonized and Ready for the Scrumping

Holy Smokes, or rather, carbon!

We are about to be bamboozled yet again by the greedy parsites of industry and govenmnet. When, I wonder, would it be a good idea to pluck their engorged bodies from our festering wounds and throw them into the flames?? Now might be good. Before they TAX OUR FREAKING AIR...oops, too late.

New Jersey WatchDog states that they are actually planning on creating an entire derivitives market based on carbon credits, as if TPTB haven't completely bent us all over the economic sofa in EVERY OTHER CATAGORY of derivitive. BTW.. isn't a derivitive basically a "bet" on future performance? Shouldn't that be illegal?

Wikipedia says ...A derivative is a financial instrument - or more simply, an agreement between two people or two parties - that has a value determined by the price of something else (called the underlying).[1] It is a financial contract with a value linked to the expected future price movements of the asset it is linked to - such as a share or a currency. There are many kinds of derivatives, with the most notable being swaps, futures, and options. However, since a derivative can be placed on any sort of security, the scope of all derivatives possible is nearly endless.

Thus, the real definition of a derivative is an agreement between two parties that is contingent on a future outcome of the underlying.


(bet [bɛt]
n
1. an agreement between two parties that a sum of money or other stake will be paid by the loser to the party who correctly predicts the outcome of an event.

Jeepers...that sounds like the same thing. Hmmmm.


Referring to derivatives as stand-alone assets would be a misconception, since a derivative is incapable of having value of its own.

THE DERIVATIVE HAS NO VALUE??? IT DOESN'T EXIST AS A COMMODITY???

However, some more commonplace derivatives, such as swaps, futures, and options, (which have a theoretical face value that can be calculated using formulas, such as Black-Scholes), have been traded on markets before their expiration date as if they were assets.

Soooo. Does that mean any fees, interest or other debt associated with the non valued derivative have a value equal to it...ZIPPO?


The financial industry is preparing a marketplace to handle billions and trillions of dollars of deals – a hot new category of investments to make everyone forget about sub-prime mortgages.

Derivative investments vehicles based on carbon dioxide emissions and RGGI permits are already available through two secondary markets – the Chicago Climate Futures Exchange and the Green Exchange.

Those markets are backed by giants in the financial world. The Green Exchange (GreenEx) is owned by the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Credit Suisse and other equity partners. The Chicago Climate Futures Exchange (CCFC) was recently purchased by IntercontinentalExchange Inc. (ICE), which operates the world’s largest energy trading platform.

Though Congress failed to pass legislation for a nationwide system, RGGI ensures that cap-and-trade remains alive in the U.S. The scheme has friends in high places, both on Wall Street and within the Obama Administration. EPA Commissioner Lisa P. Jackson was first vice-chair of RGGI in 2008 while head of NJDEP.

RGGI is the prototype for two other mandatory regional systems scheduled to start in 2012. The Midwestern Greenhouse Gas Reduction Accord will bring cap-and-trade to Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa and Kansas. The Western Climate Initiative adds California, Oregon, Washington, Arizona, Mexico, Utah and Montana – plus British Columbia, Ontario and Quebec. Manitoba is a member of both cooperatives.

Together, the three regional systems will encompass 23 states with roughly half of population in the U.S. – plus four Canadian provinces with more than three-quarters of that nation’s populace.

The bottom line: A cap-and-trade system that favors secrecy over public disclosure – and Wall Street over consumers – now has the inside track to become the de facto law of the land, even without an act of Congress.

Now that should scare the flaming crap out of everyone in the entire world that exhales carbon dioxide...yea, even you.

Ritual Cannibalism as Sacrament

Ritual Cannibalism:

The eating of all or part of the physical or symbolic body of a given person or personified entity in hopes of gaining one or more of their desirable attributes.

I was sitting in church on Sunday and witnessed something I had seen a million times, the sacrament. I dawned on me, rather unnervingly, that I was witnessing a rather savage, disturbing custom: the ceremonial eating of human flesh and drinking of human blood. Sure, symbolically, it belongs to a demi-god and we are hoping to gain some kind of spiritual influence through partaking, but damn... I actually had to pass it by. The older woman to my immediate left, however, actually licked her fingers and smiled. Her visage was so sublime I couldn't bear to tell her she had a crumb of archetypal godflesh clinging to the corner of her mouth.

Maybe anthropophagy stems from the cults of Dionysis. He does have some things in common with Jesus:

Dionysus comes down to earth as god made flesh as a savior and is the son of God.

His Father is a god and his mother is a mortal virgin.

His born in a humble stable on December 25 before three shepherds.

He dies at Easter time for the sins of the world.
After he dies he descends into hell and rises again on the third day.

He preaches about a Holy communion of his sacred body and blood for the forgiveness of sins.

Hey, isn't that Baccus???

Even anarchists have Mothers

What could be more threatening, awful, nasty and disreputable than an unwashed, disheveled, angry, weird hippie / anarchist? I mean, seriously?

Sure, I hate government. I admit this freely. Sure, I'm angry and I dress funny. Granted, I'm kind of a conversation killer and not much fun at parties or political rallies... but my mom still loves me and thinks I am special. I like to think she is right. I'm a special, angry, difficult snowflake. Thanks mom.

EHow has some help for you if Mom needs an explanation of your chaotic political bent:

LINK

The label "anarchist" has a lot of unfortunate, inaccurate connotations. For most people, the word brings to mind images of violent, bomb-throwing terrorists who want to abolish all government and replace it with chaos, lawlessness and survival-of-the-fittest. Those of us who are anarchists know better, but how can you explain your ideology to Mom (or for that matter, anyone else close to you) without freaking her out?
Difficulty: Moderately Challenging

Instructions

1
Refer to yourself as a "classical anarchist." There are a lot of people out there calling themselves "anarchists" who really DO subscribe to the violent, bomb-throwing rebellious lot, and that's not you. Making this distinction will signal to Mom that what you are has nothing to do with her preconceptions about what the word means.

2
Speak Greek. Explain that the word "anarchism" comes from the Greek "anarcho" and means "without rulers." Launch from this into the basic definition of anarchy: a governing system based on real equality, where systems are set up in such a way that no one has power over anyone else.

3
Give her a brief history lesson. Explain that the word "anarchy" being commonly used to mean "chaos" actually came about as a result of the anarchist movement of the 1800s, both because people weren't ready to imagine equality without pandemonium, and because enemies of the anarchist movement worked to push this definition.

4
Tell her that contrary to popular belief, anarchists don't actually want to set up a society that's free of rules and laws or even free of government - we just want the laws and government to be determined by and serve the people completely.

5
Explain about the best parts of what anarchism promotes: freedom, equality, liberty, and community, taking care of, defending, and looking out for each other, and letting everyone live the lives of their choosing. Explain to her that anarchists want racial, sex, and GLBT equality, are devoted to environmentalism and ending poverty, and want to see all people provided with the things they need. (You can either drop the "communism" bomb now, later, or never, depending on what you know about your mother.)

6
List some examples of prominent anarchists living today. If Mom thinks that anarchists are all crazy terrorist kids, imagine how her opinion of our ideology will change when you tell her that some of the prominent subscribers to our ideology include a famous professor of linguistics (Noam Chomsky), a renowned classical composer and former assistant to John Cage (Andrew Culver) and a martial arts fighting champion with a masters in psychology (Jeff Monson).

7
Promise your mother that you don't want to or plan to hurt anyone or blow up anything, because this is not only a violation of your principles, it's completely counterproductive. Explain that the current goals of the anarchist movement are mostly centered around helping people, fighting oppression, and educating about what what "anarchism" is really about. Tell her some of the good things you plan to do and want to do.


Hug her a lot. I think that helps...and do dishes once in awhile...